My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_800402
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
pm_800402
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:18 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/2/1980
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow stated that the applicant met with the neighbors in the residential <br />area and has indicated that the neiohbors favor the conversion. ~1r. Shardlow in- <br />dicated that the applicants and two.'contiguous neighbors have applied for the vacation <br />of street right-of-way on the east side of the church property. He stated that the <br />City staff recommends that the right-of-way not be vacated so that access could be pro- <br />vided to the property on the east, owned by the \4estbys and Fabyanskes, if and when they <br />should decide to plat additional residential lots. He sU9gested that the Commission <br />consider requiring the applicant to dedicate additional right-of-way required for the <br />street on the circle portion of the cul de sac. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. G. Johnson asked if the Commission should consider not rezoning the portion of the <br />property on which the former parsonage is located. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dressler indicated that she was concerned about the intersection of the exit from <br />Highway 36 and Minnesota Avenue. She felt there could be a traffic hazzard with the <br />increased traffic from the mortuary and asked which way funeral processions would go, <br />when leaving the mortuary. <br /> <br />Mr. Bies, Sr. indicated that they would more than likely go ,,'est to Dale Street B.nd there <br />would be a police escort with every orocession. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dressler commented that the vehicles exiting from Hi~h\lla.y 36 are not goinf' to be <br />expecting a funeral procession at that point and it could cy'eate a very dar,0erous <br />situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Bies, Sr. indicated that they did not see this as a problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Lundquist, architect representinn the aDplicant indicated that any si~n for t:,e <br />funeral home would conform to city standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow indicated that the planned unit development would prohibit the use of the <br />buildings for other uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Marvin Root, 2315 South Hill Drive, asked how many funerals there would be per \'!eek. <br /> <br />Mr. Bies, Jr. indicated there was no definite way to project the number, but he felt <br />there would be approximately one a week. <br /> <br />Mr. Simons asked if Minnesota Street was suitable for parkin~ of cars, if there was <br />overf1ow parking. <br /> <br />Mr. Drown commented that it was not. <br /> <br />Mr. Simons asked where overflow parking, if needed, would occur. <br /> <br />Mr. Lundquist indicated that he felt cars could be parked along the entrance driveway <br />which was 16 feet in width and that the applicant would be willing to extend the width <br />to 18 feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow commented that the 18 feet would be nore appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.