My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_820707
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1982
>
pm_820707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:24 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/7/1982
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 7, 1982 <br />-3- <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Matson indicated it would be a mistake to not continue the bike path <br />south all the way to Larpenteur Avenue. He felt the 6' dedication would <br />not be sufficient to construct a safe bike path. <br /> <br />Mr. North indicated the City had received a letter from Mrs. Celia Paster, <br />owner of the property north of the savings and loan on Lexington Avenue, <br />requesting the Commission to delay action until Mrs. Paster's litigation <br />with First State Bank is completed. Mr. North stated it was the City <br />Attorney's opinion that the letter had no relevancy to the application <br />before the Commission, and that it should not be considered as part of <br />their deliberations regarding the application. Mr. Doug Sinclair, rep- <br />resenting Mrs. Paster, voiced his disappointment in the City Attorney's <br />opinion. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson expressed concern about the traffic congestion caused by cars <br />leaving the shopping center and entering Lexington Avenue. Mr. Margolis <br />stated he would agree to install any kind of traffic controls that would <br />be necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina commented the LexingtonlLarpenteur area intersection is a <br />problem, and unless the County purchased additional property to alleviate <br />the traffic problem, it will remain. <br /> <br />Mr. Moeller commented that perhaps the entire 16 1/2' should be dedicated <br />to provide green space which would then connect the grass boulevard of the <br />savings and loan on the north and the proposed Getty Oil facility on the <br />south. He also felt the additional right-of-way, with some green space, <br />would give more definition to the exits onto Lexington, and make it safer. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson agreed with Mr. Moeller, and commented that with the addition <br />of some green space along Lexington, it would take some of the harshness <br />off the corner. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated the dedication of the 16 1/2' would enhance the center. <br />It would make it look and work better. <br /> <br />Mr. Margolis stated he did not want to have a green strip of grass that would <br />be killed every year by the salt. He indicated he would be willing to dedicate <br />10' for the bike path. He commented if the 16 1/2' were dedicated, he would <br />have to move two street lights, and it could cost him in the neighborhood of <br />$15,000 to $20,000. <br /> <br />Mr. David Blakenship, resident on Lindy Avenue to the west of the savings and <br />loan, indicated the residents have a problem with the savings and loan employees <br />parking on Lindy and Dionne. He felt if parking were taken away from the Margolis <br />property, these cars could also end up on the public streets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.