My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_830601
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1983
>
pm_830601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:28 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/1/1983
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 1, 1983 <br />-3- <br /> <br />Planning File 1436 - Study of Housing Alternatives in the R-l Zoning District <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated the City Council, at its April 25th meeting, adopted a <br />motion referring the issue of housing alternatives in the R-l zone to the <br />Planning commission for study and a report. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren explained that in the past few years, there has been considerable <br />discussion and research concerning housing needs and supply. Much of this <br />effort has been directed toward the potential for increasing our capacity <br />to provide needed housing at a relatively low cost by revising our standards <br />and regulations relating to the occupancy of single-family homes, particularly <br />in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. <br /> <br />There are several alternatives available for reaching this objective, the principle <br />one being allowing the development of accessory apartments in existing single- <br />family homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated that since the revision of single-family home regulations <br />may be a controversial subject, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission <br />to carefully consider all the elements, advantages, and disadvantages of possible <br />changes in the City's policy concerning single-family home occupancy. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Berry posed several questions concerning the extent of need for additional low-cost <br />housing in Roseville. These included: 1) Which population groups need low-cost <br />housing? 2) How many people would be served by changes in the City's housing <br />policy? 3) What is the current apartment vacancy rate in Roseville? 4) How <br />many single-family homes in Roseville could accommodate the addition of an <br />accessory apartment? <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated there is a shortage of affordable housing, but the <br />magnitude is difficult to measure. The housing shortage is not being reflected <br />in lowered apartment vacancy rates. This may be due to the high cost of apartment <br />rental which is causing many people to look elsewhere for housing. Some people <br />become boarders or accessory apartment tenants in single-family homes. The <br />extent to which this is occurring in Roseville is not known at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren also indicated that Roseville's current R-l zone regulations allow <br />a single-family homeowner to have a maximum of two boarders or roomers. There <br />is no limit on the number of persons related by blood who may live in a single- <br />family home. Accessory apartments are not allowed in Roseville. The element <br />distinguishing a "boarder" arrangement from an accessory apartment is the existence <br />of separate kitchen facilities in the accessory apartment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.