Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 1, 1984 <br />-2- <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina asked how the deadend street problem was going to be solved. <br /> <br />Mr. Klecker indicated that, hopefully, the deadend would be a temporary <br />situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Moeller inquired how the northerly-most townhouse lined up with existing <br />homes along County Road C. <br /> <br />Mr. Klecker indicated the townhouse was about 15 feet closer to County Road <br />C than the existing homes. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dressler requested further comment regarding the Fire Department concerns <br />on the cul-de-sac and the required water service. <br /> <br />Mr. Dougherty, Fire Chief, indicated the Uniform Fire Code requires deadend <br />roads to provide for the turning around of Fire Department apparatus. He <br />commented the proposal includes a 6" deadend water main into the townhouse <br />complex. The development requires an 8" line. In addition, if the 8" line <br />is not looped into another water main, the sprinkling of the units would be <br />required. <br /> <br />Mr. Kehr indicated they propose to construct an 8" deadend main. <br /> <br />Mr. Klecker commented the applicant would put in a temporary turnaround, using <br />a gravel base with sod over the top. Mr. Dougherty stated that would not be <br />acceptable because the gravel base would not be sufficient to hold the weight <br />of the fire trucks. Mr. Klecker felt there could be enough base to support <br />the load of the trucks. <br /> <br />Mr. Dougherty indicated either the 8" main would need to be looped into another <br />water main, or the buildings would need to be sprinklered. <br /> <br />Mr. Honchell, Public Works Director, commented the Roseville five-year capital <br />improvement program does contain a proposed water main running through the <br />park south of Mr. Kehr's property, into which an 8" main could be looped. <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina asked the status of the petition by the property owners affected <br />by the extension of the driveway to Dale Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Kehr indicated that of the three owners, Mr. John Salverda had signed <br />indicating his approval and Mr. Borgstrom has indicated he does not oppose <br />the idea, but did not want to sign the petition. <br /> <br />Ed Salverda indicated, that as one of the three property owners, he had not <br />signed the petition; he did not want to go against his neighbors. <br />