pm_840502 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission -8- I) That the drainage plan be approved by City staff. 2) That trash storage be handled inside the building. 3) That an agreement be worked out regarding the City's acquisition of right-of-way for the rerouted frontage road. 4) That the landscape plan be approved by City staff. 5) That the exterior building treatment be on all four sides of the building as proposed. Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Moeller, Dressler, Johnson, Matson, and Wiski. Nays: None. Planning File 1436 - Study of Housing Alternatives in the R-l zonlng district. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated the Commission had directed staff to prepare potential accessory housing regulations which would allow for the development of a second housing unit in an existing single-family home using procedures similar to those related to the existing minor variance process. Mr. Dahlgren indicated the Commission should now consider whether to send the proposed regulations to the Council for its approval. Discussion Moeller suggested the addition of language prohibiting the placement of additional parking in the required front yard. Berry asked for clarification regarding the language which prohibits external additions to accommodate an accessory housing unit. Dahlgren indicated that a homeowner may construct an addition to the home, then ask for an accessory housing unit. Matson suggested that a need has not been shown for an alternative accessory housing unit process. He also expressed concern that the proposed process is not very restrictive and could cause problems. Dressler indicated she was uncomfortable with the 100-foot distance for notice of affected property owners. She thought the distance should be greater. Wiski indicated the proposed process is a reasonably simple procedure which could save the Commission and homeowners a lot of paperwork and red tape.