My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_840801
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1984
>
pm_840801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:34 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/1/1984
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />3. That the garage be removed or moved to a conforming location at the <br />time of filing the final plat. <br /> <br />4. That the additional utilities charges be paid. <br /> <br />Roll call, Ayes: Dressler, Moeller, and Berry. Nays: Johnson, DeBenedet, <br />and Wiski. <br /> <br />Planning File 1525 - St. Rose of Lima Church request for special use permit <br />for P.U.D. and variance at 1248 Eldridge. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated the applicant proposes to convert the existing convent <br />to new uses, including housing for three priests and administrative offices. <br />The applicant also proposes to replace an existing detached double garage <br />with an attached triple garage at the south end of the existing convent. <br />Dahlgren indicated the only concern is that the new uses will require increased <br />parking. The applicant propose 8 new spaces along Hamline. <br /> <br />James Greenstein, a trustee of St. Rose, outlined the proposal and indicated <br />they would like to move the 2 car garage to another location on the site. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />DeBenedet indicated the application did not include moving the garage to a <br />new location on the site. <br /> <br />Debenedet indicated the 10 foot setback of the new parking is less than the <br />required 15 foot setback. <br /> <br />Dahlgren indicated the parking setback variance can be handled as part of the <br />P.U.D. approval <br /> <br />Wiski asked about screening of the garage from the southerly neighbor. <br /> <br />The applicant's architect indicated redwood fencing or a hedge could be used <br />for screening. <br /> <br />Wiski asked whether the 8 new parking spaces would handle the increased traffic. <br /> <br />The architect indicated the 8 spaces would be adequate for normal daily use. <br />The spaces in the large church/school lot would be used when large meetings <br />were held. <br /> <br />Berry expressed a concern regarding the movement of the garage to another place <br />on the site. <br /> <br />Dahlgren indicated the relocated garage would have an adverse impact on the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.