pm_841003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Mi. ,es Page 3 Matson moved, and Berry seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of an amendment to the zoning ordinance to include the following as a special use in the 1-2 district: The collection, processing, treatment and distribution of industrial wastes consisting of metal compounds, solutions and sludges, and organic and inorganic liquids, but not reactive or radioactive materials, as regulated by local, County and State agencies~ and that the Council delay its action on the proposed amendment until its October 22 meeting to allow time for the applicant to have further communications with the neighboring firms. Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Matson, Berry, DeBenedet, Dressler, Johnson and Wiski. Nays: None. Planning File 1522 - C.R. Hakworthy request for rezoning, preliminary plat and variance at 171 Center Street. Presentation Howard Dahlgren indicated this application has been continued from the August 1 Commission meeting. The proposal has been revised to include two duplex units rather than three, and to be divided into four lots rather than three. The common access drive has been retained at the northerly portion of the parcel, but has been set back ten feet from the neighboring property, rather than five feet. The drive has been retained at the north to preservematur2 trees and to enable less steep grades on the drive. C.R. Hakworthy indicated the drive will be well landscaped to protect the adjoining neighbor. The maximum height of the proposed buildings has been reduced from 34 feet to 28 feet. He indicated he is requesting a variance to set back to allow the two buildings to extend to within 13 feet of eachother at the rear. The required set back is 20 feet. Discussion Matson asked what the driveway grade and width is. Mr. Hakworthy indicated the drive grade is 5.7% and the width is 20 feet. Matson asked wbether the Fire Marshal has approved the access for emergency vehicles. Mr. Hakworthy indicated the emergency access has not been reviewed by the Fire Marshal. Moeller asked what the distance is between the neighbor to the north and the proposed northerly building. Mr. Hakworthy indicated the distance is 60 feet. DeBenedet asked what the difference in elevation is between the proposed garage level and the floor elevation of the adjacent house. The applicant indicated he did not have elevation information for the adjacent house. Mr. Klingbeil, the neighbor to the north indicated his opposition was to the proposed community drive and its proximity to his property.. DeBenedet indicated he felt the applicant has addressed the past concerns of the Commission and the neighbors well.