pm_850206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-5- Hr. Wiski indicated there was a need to continue discussion on the questions of adequate turnaround, water looping and sidewalk. He saw three inportant issues: 1) The two acre requirement for a Planned Unit Development - he stated he was persuaded by Mr. Dahlgren that there were reasons for permitting the development to be considered as a Planned Unit Development of under 2 acres. 2) Density - he corrmented the property has 5,600 square feet less than required for 13 units, which is equal to approximately the square footage required for each unit. However, he felt because of density credits, the development basically complies \.,ith the requirements. 3) Private Street - he expressed concern that the street on the Kehr property be available for use by the property O\'lners to the east at such time as their land is developed. The Homeowners Association on the Kehr property should be required to assure the maintenance of the private roadway. Mr. Matson stated it didn't seem like it would be proper to require a sidewalk when there are no sidewalks on either side. Perhaps a sidewalk should be required when the other sidewalks in the area are built. ~ir. Wiski suggested the applicant provide a teflt?Orary haIrnnerhead turnaround at the end of the private street until the property to the east is developed. This may mean waiting to build a unit or two until the street is extended. l>lrs. Johnson indicated she was troubled that the Cormnission is getting into an area that Mr. Kehr should have taken care of. Mr. DeBenedet suggested additional off-street parking should be provided. Mrs. Berry indicated she was under the impression that the Commission had directed the applicant to meet the fire codes and make plans for the developnent of the east properties before submitting the proposal again. She said that did not seem to have occurred. Recorrmendation l-1atson moved, DeBenedet seconded that the Commiss ion recommend approval of AI Kehr' s request for rezoning from R-l to R-2, special use permit for Planned Unit Development, preliminary plat and variance to density at 674 County Road C, with the following conditions: 1) That the property be developed in accordance with the site plan dated January 22, 1985. 2) That in lieu of constructing a sidewalk, the applicant shall deposit with the City an amount equal to the estimated cost of the sidewalk. 3) That the utility plans be approved by staff. 4) That no parking be permitted on the private street from the corner of the L to the east property line. 5) That a teflt?Orary hammerhead turnaround be provided at the east property line until the street is continued to the east. 6) That provisions be made to assure the private street will be maintained by the Homeowners Association, and that an easement be provided to assure the use of the street by property owners to the east.