Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />September 4, 1985 <br /> <br />P~e 8 <br /> <br />PlannilUl ~..lQjQ <br /> <br />Commers-Klodt reqeust for vacation of public easement. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that when this building was first constructed, a <br />public easement for right-of-way was dedicated which could have provided for <br />the extension of Anthony Lane from the City of St. Anthony. Ultimately the <br />properties to the west and to the east were developed by the applicants and <br />Patton Road was platted and subseqently built. Thus the easement from the St. <br />Anthony side is not really required. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson moved, seconded by Ms. Dressler that the easement vacation be <br />granted. <br /> <br />Roll Call: Ayes: Matson, Dressler, Johnson, Mueller, Wiski <br /> <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Abstain: DeBenedet <br /> <br />PlanniM File 1611 <br /> <br />Golden Age Nursing Home, variance to east side yard parking setback at 1415 <br />County Road B. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed this proposal pointing out that two plans have now been <br />presented; one of which creates space for 65 cars and one that creates space <br />for 57 cars. The two plans are basically being presented as a result of the <br />fact that there were some problems with the owner to the north, in terms of <br />utilization of that particular property. <br /> <br />Tom Dunwell, the architect representing the project, also appeared to discuss <br />the project and discussed both plans with the Planning Commission members. He <br />asked that both plans be approved contingent upon a final agreement with the <br />Blumbergs at a later date. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Dick (unidentified) pointed out that Albert should not become a no-parking <br />street. Steve Riegel asked what the rumors were regarding the purchase of the <br />three homes in the area. Riegel pointed out that he did not have any problem <br />with the proposed parking scenario. <br />