My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_851106
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1985
>
pm_851106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:38 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/6/1985
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 6, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Mr. Waldron discussed the proposed tax increment financing for this <br />proposal, and pointed out that the project will be rolled in with a <br />number of other projects for a bond issue in late Decemeber. <br /> <br />Mr. Drown discussed his concern regarding the ditch on the Frontage Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Pope, the Lido Architect, discussed his development of the project, <br />and proceeded to show the site plan, grading and drainage, floor plan, <br />elevations, and the artist's sketch of the building. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />DeBenedet asked how much brick was being used, as opposed to block. <br />Mr. Pope pointed out that some brick is being used for accent <br />material, and the way the construction is structured, the block is the <br />most cost effective. <br /> <br />Mueller asked where the mechanical systems were going to be placed. <br />Pope replied probably on the roof top. Mueller replied that he was <br />concerned as to how this would impact the aesthetics of the building. <br />Pope replied that they would try to screen and isolate the roof top <br />mechanical systems through the use of panels or framing, and maintain <br />them within the kitchen area. <br /> <br />Berry asked whether there is a separate entrance to the deli, and <br />whether you could move between the restaurant and deli areas. Pope <br />replied yes, one could move between the two areas. <br /> <br />Wiski asked whether parking could be shared with the development to <br />the north. John Labelestra stated that has been discussed, but Health <br />Resources would prefer to minimize it. Mr. Labelestra also discussed <br />the block part of the construction, stating they are using block that <br />would facilitate the "Old Italian Look" they are trying to create for <br />the building facade. He also pointed out that a significant amount of <br />the mechanical units could be placed under the first floor office <br />space. <br /> <br />Wiski asked Mr Labelestra to explain the two Special Use Permits. <br />Mr. Labelestra stated that Lido has developed a significant market for <br />their foods off-site and, thus, would like an opportunity to continue <br />to sell their frozen foods and take-out. He also stated they are not <br />proposing entertainment but, if marketing conditions dictate it has to <br />happen to remain competitive, they would like to have that option. <br /> <br />Wiski asked how they arrived at the appropriateness of 152 parking <br />spaces. Labelestra replied that it's based on over twenty-nine years <br />of business, and the parking needs they've ascertained to meet their <br />needs. It is currently a 2.5 ratio. <br /> <br />Mueller asked for an explanation of the lower level, and why there was <br />so much storage space needed. Labelestra pointed out there was only <br />one major area for storage for the tables, linens, etc. <br /> <br />Wiski noted that the rezoning does coincide with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.