My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_851204
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1985
>
pm_851204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:38 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/4/1985
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />December 4, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Wiski asked whether the City had addressed the concerns that the <br />Legislature has been focusing on in recent weeks. Waldron <br />pointed out that the City was carefully documenting its findings <br />both in terms of the revision of the districts, and the "but for <br />statements" as the legislature requires. <br /> <br />Demos also discussed some of the testimony and activity that is <br />occurring with respect to the Minnesota Legislature. <br /> <br />Matson moved, seconded by Dressler, approval of a resolution <br />stating that the proposed mofidications coincide with the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Johnson, Dressler, Matson, Mueller, <br />DeBenedet, and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Driveway Access to Residential Property <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed the difficulty of single driveways and the <br />resultant backing up of a car into a busy thoroughfare. Mr. <br />Dahlgren presented possible language for the Planning Commission <br />to consider. <br /> <br />Dressler asked for the definition of a major thoroughfare. Mr. <br />Dahlgren replied that the City has a map that depicts the major <br />thoroughfares in Rosevil1e. <br /> <br />Dressler asked whether Western was a thoroughfare, and Dahlgren <br />replied yes, but it does have less traffic than the others. <br />Dressler replied that those residents on Western may wish to <br />consider a variance. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether more should be considered than single <br />family homes, in that duplexes should also be a consideration. <br />Dahlgren replied that under a R-1 building permit, it could become <br />a condition. <br /> <br />After additional discussion, Mr. Dahlgren proposed the following <br />modified language: <br /> <br />Where new principal structures are built on lots contiguous to <br />major thoroughfares, as indicated in the City's major thoroughfare <br />plan, driveways to such lots shall be designed so as to provide a <br />turnaround facility within the lot to eliminate the need to back <br />a vehicle into the right-of-way of the major thoroughfare. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Matson seconded the motion, that the revised <br />language be approved, and that this item be a recommendation to <br />the City Council to be considered as a change to the zoning <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Johnson, Dressler, Matson, Mueller, <br />DeBenedet, and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.