My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_860409
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1986
>
pm_860409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:42 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/9/1986
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />April 9, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Maschka moved to table the request until the May 7 Planning <br />Commission meeting. Johnson seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: DeBenedet, Goedeke, Johnson, Maschka, Moeller, <br />and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Moeller asked that while this is being reconsidered, the College <br />take a close look at eliminating the pathway along the residences. <br />DeBenedet stated his concerns regarding access in and out of the <br />site, and that modification should be considered there. Goedeke <br />agreed that the west entrance deserves more of an analysis. <br />Demos pointed out that the current exit is dangerous in terms of <br />visibility. <br /> <br />Planning File 1651 <br />Jim Edlund request for Special Use Permit and variance at 2049 N. <br />snelling. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren explained the site, and how the current P.U.D. is <br />laid out on the site. Mr. Dahlgren showed the Planning Commission <br />members that the P.U.D. basically relates to a five foot setback <br />versus a fifteen foot setback, which allows the increased parking <br />to be placed further away from the adjacent property owner. <br /> <br />Mr. Edlund discussed the project, and again pointed out how the <br />variance was needed in light of the fact that he wants to keep <br />the parking lot away from his neighbor's parcel. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Johnson seconded, that the Edlund request for a <br />Special Use Permit and variance at 2049 N. Snelling be approved. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: DeBenedet, Goedeke, Johnson, Maschka, Moeller, <br />and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1652 <br />United Federal Bank request for sign variance at 1715 W. County <br />Road B-2. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed the location of the new sign, and pointed <br />out that this is a new owner. The facility was previously owned <br />by First Federal, which has now moved into headquarters on <br />Larpenteur, based on a merger. Dahlgren pointed out that the <br />Ordinance does not allow flashing signs; thus the request is a <br />variance to the prohibition of flashing signs. However, the bank <br />will only allow time, temperature, and a thirteen minute message; <br />thus the traveling message will not be allowed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.