pm_860409 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planl!~ng Commission Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 9 Moeller asked why the fifth and sixth floors weren't depicted in the packet. Mr. Thompson replied that the fifth and sixth floors are the same as the fourth floor. Goedeke asked whether the pond dedication was completed. Milo Thompson replied yes, that was part of the Development Agreement with the City. Moeller asked how the mechanical systems were going to be screened. Thompson replied that they have not completely considered all the points relating to the mechanical system, but that would be the object of the parapets, to screen said mechanical equipment. Maschka asked what the rents would be. Goldstein replied that this was a housing revenue bond; thus twenty percent of the housing would have to be available to low and moderate income people. Sandy McGiffin, 1379 Brooks, asked if the previous conditions would remain. Mr. Thompson replied that they would be more than willing to stand by the original conditions. Charles Machacek, 1323 Oakcrest, asked why the study relating to the needs of Senior Citizens didn't happen before the previous approval. Thompson replied this is very typical of an architec- tural process which includes significant modifications. Mrs. Stern, 1401 Brooks, discussed the history of the previous approval, and stated her opposition to the higher density. Elaine Anderson, 2499 Sheldon, stated that she didn't like the increased stories, and why did it need to change? Goldstein replied that the developers have nothing to gain financially by making the change, and they are not increasing the units, but actually developing a more costly project through the use of masonry construction. Marilyn Ahlberg, 2498 Holton, stated that this area was a very desirable place right now, and a six story residence would wreck it. Roger Wachter, 2541 Pascal, suggested that the project could have been reconfigured to meet the footprint concerns without having to move toward a six story structure to accomplish this purpose. Wiski asked if the developers could modify the project, and stay within forty-four feet in height. Thompson stated that the project would simply have to spread out again, and that it was their opinion that even though they were going up six stories, the setbacks were the critical element to the neighbors.