pm_860507 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning commission Minutes May 7, 1986 Page 11 The Pink Associates architect discussed the site plan, and stated the developer's willingness to work with the neighbors. Moeller asked what the actual parking requirements were for each site. Dahlgren replied that the site has to be viewed on the whole as it relates to the three developments, and it does meet the minimums. Banet pointed out that most of the new parking was being created in Site A. DeBenedet asked whether the handicap requirements were going to be met with respect to parking. Banet said they will meet or exceed those requirements. DeBenedet asked about snow removal. Will it actually be removed from the site? Banet replied yes it would, particulary in light of the fact that it negatively impacts the customers and, thus the relationship with their tennants. Goedeke stated his concerns about the parking in the area, and also his concerns about the zero lot line recommendations. Banet pointed out that the North Star Bank is currently parking in their lot and once the Bank's construction is done, that parking development agreement will be canceled. Banet also pointed out that parking is currently up against the street at this point in time; however with the modifications, it will actually be set back further from where it is today. Dahlgren reiterated again that the variance is needed simply because the right-of-way is required, and the applicants have been more than cooperative in working with the City, and dedicating the required right-of-way. Wiski asked what the building was going to be like in the rear part. Banet replied it will be brick, and they will work with the neighbors in terms of landscaping. Moeller asked for a diagraming of the median cuts, which Banet proceeded to do. Dahlgren also discussed the forthcoming petition, that the developers will be requesting new curb on Lexington. Wiski noted the letter of opposition from a resident, that was to be made a formal part of the record. Scott Erhart, 1792 Lindy Avenue, asked what the codes were with respect to parking. Wiski replied they were five per 1,000 square feet. Erhart asked about traffic and marketing studies. Janisch stated that the county would have to be asked to analyze the traffic problems. Mr. Paster, the developer, stated that their current shopping centers are essentially one hundred percent leased, but there is substantial demand for smaller shops which their new facility will meet. Dr. John Kennedy stated that the Plaza has not maintained proper cleanup, and there should be a means that this trash does not continually end up at this clinic. He also has a serious ques- tion about parking in the area, and that it seems often times it ends up in his lot.