Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />May 7, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />Dahlgren also replied that the engineering and systems exist to <br />clean up the traffic in the area, and it can easily be solved <br />once the county decides that there is enough traffic on the <br />street to warrant the appropriate action. Eckhart asked for an <br />explanation of how this was different than any other problem. <br />Wiski replied that if these individuals wanted to, they could go <br />in and build a facility tomorrow, as it is properly zoned. <br /> <br />Councilman Johnson asked whether the zero lot line could be put <br />in the back of the building. Dahlgren replied that fire exits <br />are required in the rear. <br /> <br />Blankenship asked whether the rear yard landscape can be <br />negotiated. Wiski replied yes, it could. Dr. Kennedy again <br />asked that the project not be approved, and that there is a major <br />problem with parking, and it should be down sized. Paster <br />replied they would like to keep this development as attractive as <br />possible, and they provided a twenty-four hour telephone where <br />they can be reached with respect to any problems. He also empha- <br />sized he wants to remain a good neighbor to the area. <br /> <br />Blankenship asked whether the fence could be over six feet. <br />Dahlgren replied that the ordinance limits fences to six feet; <br />however, if the Council approved a higher one through a variance <br />it could be possible. At this point in time it was decided that <br />the motions would proceed separately per each request. <br /> <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, approval of Paster Enterprises <br />request for parking variance at 1688 - 1754 North Lexington. The <br />following conditions were attached: <br /> <br />1. The seven feet on Lexington be dedicated. <br /> <br />2. Appropriate number of handicapped stalls are available. <br /> <br />3. Landscape and engineering plans be reviewed by City staff. <br /> <br />4. A Development Agreement be signed with the City. <br /> <br />5. A sidewalk be constructed on the Larpenteur side of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Moeller, DeBenedet, Maschka, Johnson, <br />Goedeke, and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that it appears that the shopping center could <br />be built today, even though the developers could have problems <br />with the setbacks. Dahlgren stated that the right-of-way is a <br />policy, not an ordinance, and therefore the City could lose such <br />a challenge in court. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded, that Paster Enterprises request <br />for variances at 1755 North Lexington be approved with the <br />following conditions: <br />