pm_860806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes August 6, 1986 Page 3 Maschka asked what type of development occurs after a center like this is completed. Mark Koegler replied that they have no con- clusive proof yet as to what occurs after a center like this is developed, but it is was his opinion it does create the appropriate tone for positive, ancillary growth in the area. Dahlgren replied that the B-4 District disallows exterior storage, and proceeded to reiterate his position that the Costco development would be an excellent catalyst in the area. Maschka asked what would happen if this project was not approved. Dahlgren replied that at this point in time, another terminal could move into the Indianhead site. He stated office demand at this time is simply too thin; thus a significant office building would not occur at that particular site. He stated that, in his opinion, additional mixed retail development could occur in this area that would be very positive, similar to what has been seen around other Target stores. Wiski stated that consideration of this item should be pursuant to each request that Costco is making. divided Leonard Laskow, 1970 Brenner, pointed out that the Commission should be aware that Costco would probably other Costco type stores. Planning generate Johnson requested that Wiski clarify the order of consideration on this issue. Wiski again discussed the fact that the Comprehensive Plan should be considered first, the rezoning second, and the Special Use Permit third. Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the Costco request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment :Erom Industrial to Business be approved. DeBenedet asked hO'N the City initiates a broader Comprehensive Plan modification in the area. Demos replied that the staff, Council, or Planni:~g commission can initiate such a request. Johnson stated it would be her preference that a comprehensive analysis of the whole County Road C area take place. Goedeke asked if a truck terminal could move into the warehouse is Costco fails. Dahlgren replied that if there was a terminal in place, another truck terminal could move in. If Costco fails, the development could not revert to a truck terminal. Demos stated that this was not her understanding with respect to the grandfathering clause of B-4 when it was first developed. Wiski stated that he was not comfortable with a piecemeal development, and it was his opinion that a more comprehensive approach in this whole redevelopment area was needed. Dahlgern pointed out that an overall analysis by PFS had occurred, and that it was their opinion that the site was workable.