My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_861001
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1986
>
pm_861001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:46 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/1986
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 1, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />1. That the garage be removed before the final plat is approved. <br /> <br />2. That the house on the western most lot be ten feet from its <br />proposed eastern lot line. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Goedeke, Berry, Maschka, Johnson, and <br />Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1699 <br />Mar-Len Development Corporation request for Special Use Permit and <br />sign variance at 2550 Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed the area on the map. He also stated this <br />was one of the nicest terminals in the City, and he assumed it <br />would be one that would operate longer in the City of Roseville. <br />Mr. Dahlgren proceeded to discuss the various elements of the site <br />plan. He is extremely concerned with the fact that the rear of <br />the building faces the front, and that the elevated parking could <br />create a problem. Dahlgren stated that the Planning Commission <br />was faced with the problem in which the conditions had to change <br />or the use had to change. <br /> <br />Janisch discussed the drainage, which he thought basically was <br />workable. <br /> <br />Leonard Vanasse, representing Price Savers, stated that his <br />company will buy the site, redevelop it, 'and sell it to Price <br />Savers. He also pointed out that the elevated parking could <br />possibly be eliminated through an agreement with Standard Oil, if <br />Standard Oil would allow removal of the berm and a lowering of the <br />pipeline. <br /> <br />Mr. Vanasse also stated the sign variance request is a result of <br />the fact that there is an option to allow the billboard to remain <br />until 1990. <br /> <br />Maschka asked whether <br />front of the building. <br />would remain. <br /> <br />the loading docks were going to stay in <br />Vanasse replied yes, that's where they <br /> <br />Johnson asked <br />Vanasse replied <br />development. <br /> <br />why the building is, in effect, turned <br />that the transmission lines force this <br /> <br />around. <br />type of <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if the building would be all new construction. <br />Vanasse replied that it would. <br /> <br />Berry asked if it was legal to park under a power line. <br />replied it was legal. <br /> <br />Janisch <br /> <br />Wi ski asked what percent of the development would be landscaped. <br />Vanasse replied that it would be in excess of the requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.