Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 5, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that anyone who has attended the last six <br />meetings of the Planning Commission also should understand that <br />the idea of a moratorium is not new, and that the Planning Commis- <br />sion has been asking for a comprehensive approach to a number of <br />the City's targeted areas. <br /> <br />Berry proceeded to discuss the Planning Commission's role in <br />reviewing land use as opposed to the economic viability of certain <br />projects. <br /> <br />Wiski stated that a moratorium could be placed on the proposed <br />areas, but not to exceed six months. <br /> <br />Maschka also stated his concern that a "mini plan" should be <br />created for a number of these areas. <br /> <br />Waldron stated that the staff completely agreed with Maschka's <br />approach, and that additional recommendations will be forthcoming <br />to the City Council and Planning Commission regarding the formula- <br />tion of such plans. Waldron stated that it was the staff's <br />concern that the pure office areas, as recommended by PFS, first <br />be addressed through the moratorium; subsequently, implementation <br />of the rest of the plan would proceed relative to the approval or <br />denial of the moratorium. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Berry seconded, that the Planning Commission <br />recommend to the City Council adoption of the resolution as read <br />by Waldron, based on the following findings of fact: <br /> <br />1. The City needs to review its development options in the areas <br />with respect to financial implications, tax revenues, spin-off <br />development property values, and job creation ramifications. <br /> <br />2. The City needs to study the possible rezoning in the area for <br />more appropriate use. <br /> <br />3. The City needs to study the Port Authority's capacity and <br />options to participate more substantially in the target area. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />The City needs to review the potential for <br />proposal from various developers to facilitate <br />intensity of the development in the area. <br /> <br />request for <br />the desired <br /> <br />5. The City needs to review the potential for modifications to <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Maschka moved an amendment, which Berry seconded, stating that the <br />following items be added to the Planning Commission recommenda- <br />tions: <br /> <br />1. That additional planning activities not be limited to the <br />moratorium area. <br /> <br />2. That the City consider adoption of additions to the zoning <br />ordinance. <br />