Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 5, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Mrs. Machacek, 1323 Oakcrest, asked what exactly was being con- <br />sidered that evening. Janisch replied that it was only setting <br />lines, it wasn't changing the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Mclain asked how the pond was going to be shaped, and whether <br />the path would be lit. Janisch showed, on the map, how the pond <br />would be developed, and stated that the path, at this point in <br />time, would not be lit. <br /> <br />Berry moved, Maschka seconded, that the pointe <br />Corporation request for preliminary plat at 2545 <br />approved. <br /> <br />Development <br />Hamline be <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Goedeke, Moeller, Maschka, Johnson, and <br />Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1705 <br />Commers-Klodt request for sign variance at 2640 - 2690 Patton <br />Road. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren showed the area on the map where the sign would be <br />placed. Essentially, a ponding area exists on the front part of <br />the property; thus, if the sign was placed in the proper area, it <br />would be in the pond. The developers are requesting zero ft. <br />setback on Patton Road, and a twenty-five foot setback on County <br />Road C. Forty feet is the requirement. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked whether any sidewalks were prposed in the area. <br />Paul Klodt replied that there were none. <br /> <br />Wiski asked whether new signs would be going up later, and would <br />they consider limiting any new signs. Klodt said he did not plan <br />to put up any new signs. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked why the sign couldn't be placed on the northern part <br />of the parcel. Klodt replied that the southern part of the <br />development is the entrance into the project, off County Road C. <br /> <br />Moeller asked whether the sign was lit. <br />ground lit. <br /> <br />Klodt replied that it is <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Berry seconded, that the Commers-Klodt request for <br />sign variance at 2640-2690 Patton Road be approved. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Goedeke, Moeller, Maschka, Johnson, and <br />Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1710 <br />Commers-Klodt request for preliminary plat at 2640-2690 Patton <br />Road. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Janisch showed the proposed plat that was deemed workable, with <br />the following conditions: <br />