Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planninr' ~ommission Minutes <br />February 4, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Stokes asked what would happen if numerous tenants in a single office <br />building wanted multiple signs. Dahlgren replied that per each <br />structure, only one pylon sign is allowed. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked what if this sign wasn't large enough, <br />request a larger one. Dahlgren replied, yes that was a <br />unless limited in the approval at this meeting. <br /> <br />could Long <br />possibility <br /> <br />Berry moved, <br />variance at <br />condition: <br /> <br />Goedeke seconded, that Long Cadillac's request for sign <br />2325 North Prior Avenue be approved with the following <br /> <br />1. That the sign be set back 30 feet, and that the sign use must be <br />the one identified as D96-60 in the plans. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether other signs could be added to exceed the <br />total. Dahlgren replied that the signage could not exceed the total <br />amount allowed in the area. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: DeBenedet, Stokes, Maschka, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, <br />and Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1721 <br />LeRoy Peickert request for division of lot and variance at 845 Bren- <br />ner Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed the site and showed how the lots were being <br />divided, which does meet the minimum lot size. The old lot line <br />setback for side yard in the area was five feet; therefore, a new lot <br />would require a ten foot variance. The applicant is asking for a <br />five foot variance versus the required ten feet. <br /> <br />Berry asked whether the new home would be ten feet from the side <br />yard. Dahlgren replied, yes it would have to be constructed in that <br />manner. Janisch pointed out that the lot split will create an addi- <br />tional ten assessable feet. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Berry seconded, that the LeRoy Peickert request for <br />division of lot and variance at 845 Brenner Avenue be approved with <br />the condition that the assessment be paid. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: DeBenedet, Stokes, Maschka, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, <br />and Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1722 <br />Robert D. Linell request for division of lot at 1835 North Chats- <br />worth. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren showed the location, and pointed out <br />basically reestablishing a pre-existing lot. <br />lot does coincide with other lots in the area. <br /> <br />that this proposal is <br />The seventy-one foot <br />