pm_870204 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes February 4, 1987 Page 6 Johnson again reiterated that this was Special Use Permit. It was not changing the appearance of the home, and the issue before the Planning Commission was not the long-range use in the area. Dahl- gren proceeded to discuss the City's policy relating to development in residential areas. Phil Toconita, 1391 West Sandhurst, asked how this will impact his property, and what will the people be doing at the home. Golden Age's staff replied in the summer, people would come out of the house in the backyard, and would need supervision. Peickert stated that it was his opinion that this development would probably not work economically. Johnson replied that was not the Planning commission's issue. Lois Goneau, 1377 Sandhurst, asked what recourse the neighborhood had in a case like this. Johnson replied it was her opinion that the neighborhood would not substantially change as a result of this special use, but that's why a special use must first be reviewed in the area before the day-care operation could be effectuated. Vern Johnson special use. asked whether a time limitation can be placed Dahlgren replied yes, it could. on the Berry reiterated her history and experience with respect to property values and how they have not dropped. Stokes moved, Maschka seconded, that the Good Neighbor, Inc. request for Special Use Permit at 1391 West County Road B be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the permit is in place for one year after the operation starts. After that, the applicant must resubmit application. 2. That a pathway easement be granted to the City. 3. That the State regulations, when approved, apply to the opera- tion. Golden Age's staff stated they were concerned if this were revoked, they would have made a major investment. Johnson stated it was her opinion that the Planning Commission needed to protect the neighbors. Moeller stated if things go well, this should'nt have to be revoked. Goedeke asked why ten people were deemed appropriate for the client load. The Golden Age representative stated this was a break even point for them. DeBenedet made a friendly amendment that was accepted by Stokes and Maschka which added the following two conditions: 1. That no expan- sion of the facility is allowed, and 2. That the applicant provide three parking spaces in the back or side yard which would include the garage.