pm_870506 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes May 6, 1987 Page 10 2. Is PAD development acceptable in the area? 3. The uses are very restrictive, and flexibility should be considered. 4. The criteria is somewhat extensive in terms of setbacks. 5. More flexibility with respect to materials should be considered. 6. Site coverages with FAR will enhance massing. 7. How was the site plan review conducted? 8. How is offstreet loading to be considered? 9. Are there guidelines relating to the site planning review process. Rick Johnson, from Johnson Florists, stated it was his concern that he won't be able to get his money out of his property, and how would the easements be addressed with respect to zoning? Bob Anderson, from Union Carbide, stated he also wanted flexibility on his site, and he supported a five year review of the zones. Substantial discussion proceeded in which basic agreement reached pursuant to each item. The attached zone reflects changes that were modified and subsequently approved evening. was the that DeBenedet moved, Stokes seconded, approval of the new B-6 zone as modified with a five year review. Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, Maschka, and Johnson. Nays: None. Proposed Langton Lake Park Master Plan. Johnson pointed out that the item under consideration for the Planning Commission that evening was simply to ascertain as to whether the proposed Langton Lake Master Plan was consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Representatives from Mr. Dahlgren's office proceeded to discuss the Master Plan in significant detail. Mr. Stokes asked the cost of the development. Frank Rog responded with respect to the early costs that are envisioned in the proposed LAWCON grant. A number of residents asked questions with respect to the criteria that will be used in ascertaining the compatibility to the Comprehensive Plan.