Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />May 6, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Johnson asked if the tires could be picked up more often; thus <br />the fence could be placed at six feet. Moeller replied that the <br />fence should be half the height of the building. <br /> <br />Waldron and Janisch proceeded to find the previous record of <br />approval, which did show general storage areas as being depicted <br />in the original plans. <br /> <br />Stokes asked whether Lundquist could work with another company to <br />jointly store the tires. Lundquist stated that could potentially <br />be a problem. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that the Planning Commission could possibly <br />consider a six foot fence. <br /> <br />Moeller stated that, in his opinion, the additional two feet <br />would ensure that the tires were properly covered. <br /> <br />Berry agreed that the two additional feet may make some sense in <br />terms of site aesthetics. <br /> <br />Maschka asked if pine trees were going to planted adjacent to the <br />fence. Lundquist replied that they would. <br /> <br />Stokes stated that it was his opinion that the fence should be <br />properly maintained. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated his worry about the maintenance of the fence and <br />the shortage of manpower in the Code Department to ensure that <br />the fence stayed in proper repair. <br /> <br />Lundquist pointed out that he is proposing a heavy duty fence. <br /> <br />Dahlgren pointed out that if the fence had to be constructed of <br />masonry, it would be construed as a wall and thus require a <br />setback variance. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked as to whether Rosepointe has not proposed a wall <br />within the setback. Dahlgren pointed out that wall was simply <br />part of the P.U.D. <br /> <br />Stokes asked if a condition of five years could be placed on the <br />fence. Dahlgren replied yes, conditions can be applied. Stokes <br />stated it may be appropriate to see how the fence works over a <br />five year period. Dahlgren pointed out that the respective <br />approvals go to the land, not to the respective occupants or <br />property owners. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded, to table this until the right- <br />of-way dedication be properly executed and the landscaping be <br />completed. <br /> <br />Stokes asked why not simply place conditions on this <br />Both DeBenedet and Berry stated that many of these <br />seem to slip through the cracks. <br /> <br />proposal. <br />conditions <br />