Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />May 6, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Blankenship also stated he would prefer that the sign in the back <br />not be lighted. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded, that First Minnesota <br />Bank request for rezoning from B-1 to B-1b at 1124 Dionne <br />be approved with the following conditions: <br /> <br />Savings <br />Street <br /> <br />1. That the development occur per plans dated March 30, 1987. <br /> <br />2. That the bank meet with staff and neighbors to work out the <br />landscape situation. <br /> <br />3. That staff approve final engineering plans. <br /> <br />4. That the bank turn off lighting on the sign at the rear of <br />the building. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, <br />Maschka, and Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br />Abstain: Moeller. <br /> <br />Planning File 1748 <br />ZLZ Company request for Special Use Permit at 1909 West Highway <br />36. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren showed the area and pointed out that a 40' x 50' <br />building is being proposed on the front of the facility. <br />Dahlgren pointed out this was previously approved at one time, <br />but the approval has expired. Dahlgren stated the parking will <br />meet code, and that the current B-1b zoning requires a site plan <br />review. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether the addition would stand out in front of <br />other buildings. Dahlgren replied that it would, but both owners <br />of the adjacent buildings previously approved the setbacks. <br /> <br />Berry asked how the inappropriate trash container in the back of <br />the lot would be addressed. Loren Devine, representing Construc- <br />tion 70, stated that the trash container is not addressed as part <br />of the proposal, but it could be considered. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether new owners were taking over the building. <br />Devine replied no, but a potential lease is in place for the new <br />addition. <br /> <br />Berry asked how the outside of the building would be designed. <br />Devine stated it would match the existing facility. <br /> <br />Goedeke stated it was his concern that the trash in the rear <br />should be cleaned up, and this item should possibly be tabled. <br /> <br />Johnson asked whether the trash could be enclosed as part of a <br />condition. Dahlgren replied that it could, but it is not <br />required by code. <br />