My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_870603
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_870603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:49 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/3/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 3, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />5. That the building be constructed of brick on all four sides, <br />matching Byerly's colors. <br /> <br />6. That a driveway be provided, if necessary, to provide access <br />to contiguous properties to the north. <br /> <br />7. That the development be constructed as per plans dated April <br />30, 1987. <br /> <br />8. That the applicant return to the next Planning Commission <br />with more information on the exterior of the building, and <br />signage. <br /> <br />9. That the parapet height be increased to cover the mechanical <br />systems on the roof. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, <br />Maschka, and Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1743 <br />Marvin Lundquist request for Special Use Permit and variance to <br />the zoning ordinance at 1331 Larpenteur Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren pointed out that the applicant is requesting to build an <br />eight foot fence versus the four foot fence, which allowed in the <br />ordinance. Dahlgren stated this application was delayed because <br />of the dedication and landscaping requirements that had not been <br />completed. <br /> <br />Mr. Lundquist stated that the owner was working on the easement <br />documents, and the landscaping is completed. Janisch pointed out <br />that the landscaping is not completely finished, and that the sod <br />has not been placed, and trees and bushes still must be planted. <br />Janisch stated that the owner has the easement, but had not <br />returned it to the City at the time of the meeting. <br /> <br />Maschka asked if the storage area would be on a concrete pad. <br />Lundquist replied that it would be in crushed rock. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if Lundquist had talked to the neighbors. <br />Lundquist replied that he had talked to his neighbor, who stated <br />his concerns. It was Lundquist's opinion that if the neighbor <br />did have substantial concerns, he should show up at the meeting <br />and be heard. <br /> <br />Resident on Belmont Lane asked as to whether the tires are a fire <br />hazard. Lundquist replied that they were not any more of a <br />hazard than those stored in the building, and that tires are not <br />very combustible. <br /> <br />Berry stated her concern that the documents were still not in. <br />Moeller stated that this could be a condition of the approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.