pm_870713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Paget11 Wednesday, July 13, 1988 commented that there would be a high cost burden on them if they have to move and recommended that the city disapprove this plan. Craig Erickson, 1709 Millwood, planning that was going on, but at single family zoning instead pointed out the cost of land development. stated that he appreciated the inquired if the city has looked of industrial zoning. Johnson would prohibit single family Erickson encouraged the ci ty to explore compatible uses wi th trucking to facilitate trucking and light industrial uses, and stated his opposition to mUlti-family and retail development in the area. Les MacNamara, H&W Motor Express, stated that his company does not plan on moving now or in the future, and encouraged the city to deny the plan and any rezoning in the area. Tim Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane, stated his concern about the effect of the redevelopment of the area further north, and pointed out that value is relative. Callaghan stated that there may be an increase in tax value, but a decrease in the value to the city and the citizens who live in the area. Callaghan stated that he was against high density housing because it is out of scale with the area, the resulting concentration which would be detrimental to the city, is not consistent with Metropolitan Council projections, and because no study has been completed on the impact of the housing on schools. Callaghan added that there has been insufficient consideration of storm water run-off, including debris and silting problems in the lakes in the area. Callaghan said he would rather see more direct benefit though uses which would create higher value jobs. Callaghan pointed out that the increased tax base created would go to pay for initial improvements, and that citizens would never see the benefit because taxes would never be reduced. Pamela Case, 2898 Mildred, stated that what is being talked about is concrete, but what about the effect on children and wildlife in the area. steve Walsh, 1984 County Road C-2, stated that the city should stay with office zoning. william Kimes, 1740 Millwood, stated his support for the plan, and that it would result in better quality then trucking. Kimes pointed out that high density housing would be a problem. Johnson closed the public hearing.