Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page # 12 <br /> <br />Wednesday, January 6, 1988 <br /> <br />it is a high priority for the post office. <br /> <br />Jaehne inquired whether or not the post office would buy the site <br />on a conditional basis. Kaufhold responded that the zoning must <br />be accomplished first before the post office will proceed with <br />the acquisition. <br /> <br />Jaehne commented on the need for a fence and inquired about who <br />would be required to build and maintain the fence. Dahlgren <br />responded by saying that the city ordinance requires the fence to <br />be built, It would be built and maintained by the developer. <br />Janisch indicated that there would be a bond required to insure <br />that the fence gets built. <br /> <br />Jim Lyons, 1179 Burke Avenue, asked whether or not the plan <br />provided by the post office was for this particular site, or if <br />it is just one that exists elsewhere. Dunwell responded by <br />saying that the post office provided the plan for this particular <br />location. Lyons inquired what the dimensions and height of the <br />proposed post office building would be. Dunwell responded by <br />saying the main post office building would be lS0 ft. long and <br />the garage 130 ft. long, and it would be set back 75 ft. from the <br />property line. The structure would be a one story building in <br />the range of 15 to 16 ft. high. Lyons expressed concern about <br />the loading dock next to the residential area and inquired <br />whether or not the parking and loading dock could be <br />flip/flopped. Dunwell responded by saying the trucks would not <br />extend past the building. Lyons indicated concern over the <br />truck noise. <br /> <br />Ellen Shelton, 2018 Lexington Avenue, indicated concerns because <br />the city would be losing the open skating area and other open <br />space. The city would not be acquiring, but losing half of the <br />open space. <br /> <br />Bakeman indicated that while she was pleased to see the park, and <br />parking space provided, she was concerned about five (5) <br />additional acres of commercial in a residential area. She <br />indicated that this was not a commercial neighborhood, but a <br />large residential neighborhood that needs to be protected. She <br />indicated that she hoped that the commission would vote to <br />recommend denial. <br /> <br />Jaehne indicated that traffic was still a problem, he indicated <br />that while he appreciates the consideration for the park, the <br />comprehensive plan shows the area as residential. He indicated <br />that the commercial being proposed is larger than the adjacent <br />corners, and was concerned that residential use of the site was <br />not considered. He indicated that the post office may change <br />their mind, and if the price of the land isn't right, the parK <br />