pm_880106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page #8 Wednesday, January 6, 1988 Dunwell felt that they have addressed the concerns which have been expressed about the project. The development is consistent with other commercial in the area, that commercial would not extend further to the South than Bridgemans, and the R-I zoning would be maintained adjacent to the residential property to the west. The project would benefit all parties by providing the city with park plan at reasonable cost and provide parking at no cost. Dunwell indicated that at the neighborhood meeting, he believed that the consensus was that it was a good plan, and that it solves a number of the neighborhood concerns. He indicated that 4 or 5 people indicated that they would support the project. Dunwell indicated that the proposal would allow the school district to sell the depleted facility and receive money to remodel other buildings, or for additional programs. Dunwell indicated that it would also allow an existing business in the city to expand and meet its needs. He indicated that they are requesting that the city approve their plans. Maschka questioned whether or not there were any drawings for the proposed addition to the Rose Gallery. Dunwell responded that there were no drawings, but that current materials would be matched, and the existing character of the building enhanced. Stokes inquired whether or not the curb cut on County Rd. B had been moved, Dunwell indicated that it had. DeBenedet inquired what the sale pr ice was for the property. Kaufhold responded that it was $1,008,000.00. DeBenedet asked how much parking space would be provided for the mail drop. Dunwell responded that stacking for 6-7 cars would be provided. DeBenedet indicated a concern that sufficient stacking space be provided because the facility is on a high volume street, and not a low volume as at the present location. Berry inquired as to if the two parking areas could be connected to serve peak traffic needs. Kaufhold responded that he had looked at it, but had rejected it because they did not \'lant to have somebody cutting the corner through their property. Berry questioned whether the stacking space for the mail drop area could be expanded. Dunwell responded that it could be expanded during the fine tuning process for final development. Goedeke asked whether or not they had worked with the post office on developing the plan for this specific site. Dunwell responded that they requested a drawing from the post office and that the dimensions of this site are close to the dimensions provided by the post office. Their plan closely matches the post office plan. They have expanded their parking to show a 20 year projection, however.