Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page://: <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 4, 1988 <br /> <br />of Engineers, and the Grasslake Water Management Organization. <br />Honchell pointed out that the DNR has set elevation 886.6 as the <br />normal high water line, that the highest water level recognized <br />by the Army Corps of Engineers was an elevation 888.2, and that <br />the Grasslake Water Management Organization had said there should <br />be no variances to the 75 ft. lake shore setback requirements. <br /> <br />Debenedet asked what the Army Corps of Engineers concerns were. <br />Honche11 replied that their concern would be placing fill in the <br />area between the highest water elevation to the open water. <br /> <br />Debenedet questioned where the house on the proposed lot 8 would <br />be located, and indicated a concern that there would not be <br />enough buildable lot area on lot 8. <br /> <br />Debenedet questioned why there were separate outlots being <br />provided. Reiling replied that two outlots were being provided <br />in anticipation of someday either a variance being obtained or <br />standards changing which would allow houses to be built on those <br />lots. <br /> <br />Moeller questioned the size of the two lots on Orchard Lane <br />indicating that they were below the city standards. Dahlgren <br />responded that they were below current standards but were <br />buildable and in scale with other lots in the area which would <br />allow the city to approve a proposed plat. <br /> <br />Moeller commented that the width may be consistent with other <br />lots in the area but the depth and overall square footage were <br />not consistent which concerned him. <br /> <br />Maschka asked where buildable area is measured from. If it were <br />measured from the high water line, a number of the lots would <br />appear to be too small. <br /> <br />Dahlgren indicated that for purposes of computing the minimum lot <br />the total lot is used, not just the portion of the lot outside <br />the high water line. <br /> <br />Debenedet questioned the need for front yard setback variances on <br />all of the lots adjacent to Lake Owasso. Reiling answered that <br />the main concern was on lots 6, 7, and 8. Dahlgren responded <br />that the variances were appropriate on the south but that they <br />may not be needed on the northerly lots. <br /> <br />Goedeke inquired if fill had been hauled in by Mr. Reiling and if <br />he had any intentions of providing any more fill on lot 8. <br />Reiling responded that he had filled in the past, but would not <br />