Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagett <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Stokes seconded that the Planning Commission <br />recommend approval of a 10 foot sign setback variance with the <br />following conditions. <br /> <br />1. That the sign area not exceed 28 sq. ft. <br /> <br />2. That the height of the sign not exceed 5 ft. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, Berry, DeBenedet, Maschka, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br />Planninq File 1855 <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />W. Yale Marshall request for a lot division at 2120 N. Cleveland <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the proposal and the location of the site. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned how the front yard setback requirements <br />would be applied to lot B. Dahlgren explained that the setback <br />would be considered from the south line of the widest part of the <br />lot but not the street line because of the odd shape of the lot. <br /> <br />Keel explained what assessments would be due on the property. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned what kind of house would be developed on the <br />new lot. Marshall explained the type of house and location. <br /> <br />Goedeke inquired if the applicant had talked to the neighbors <br />about the large setback of the house from Eldridge. Marshall <br />indicated that he had talked to the neighbor and they did not <br />have any problem with the setback and that they would be relived <br />about the removal of the dirt pile on the site. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked what would happen with the dirt pile on the site. <br />Marshall responded that the dirt would be used on the site. <br /> <br />Berry questioned whether the applicant had a problem with the <br />condition that the garage be removed. Marshall indicated that <br />he had no problem with that. <br /> <br />DeBenedet inquired if the dirt pile was topsoil from the <br />adjacent lot. Marshall replied that it was not top soil and <br />that they did not need the dirt on the adjacent property. <br />