Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagett <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Ettesvold indicated that they would be willing to provide both <br />the fence and the landscaping. <br /> <br />Maschka asked about the nature of the business and the traffic <br />impact it would have on the area. Ettesvold replied that the <br />traffic impact would be minimal. That they would occupy half of <br />the area of the building, and they would typically have two <br />people in the office, and two people out of the office at any <br />given time. The other space in the building would be leased to <br />low intensity type uses such as attorneys, accountants, or <br />insurance agencies. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned why the applicant chose this site and <br />indicated his concern about the growth of the business and its <br />future impact on the area. Ettesvold replied that they are a <br />growing business and could potentially in the future occupy the <br />whole building but would not generate a significant increase in <br />traffic in the area in the future. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the future use of the property as single <br />family residential was not appropriate and that this change would <br />be an appropriate one. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if it would be possible to drain the site to the <br />east to Marion Street. Keel responded that it would be difficult <br />because there is no storm sewer on Marion and because it would be <br />going against the natural slope of the land. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned what handicapped accessibility changes would <br />be required for the building. Dahlgren responded that he was not <br />certain but improvements would be required. Ettesvold repl ied <br />that they would be handicapped accessible restrooms. <br /> <br />Goedeke inquired what filling and bank stabilization would be <br />required for the parking area. Ettesvold responded that little <br />fill would be required and no unusual bank stabilization would be <br />required. Johnson pointed out that this could be addressed in <br />the landscape plan. <br /> <br />Berry stated that she liked the idea of sharing the parking lot <br />with the church and inquired if the applicant had discussed this <br />possibility with the church. Ettesvold answered that they have <br />offered to share their parking lot with the church, but it may <br />not be convenient for them. He also indicated that they would <br />work jointly with the church to fix up the chain link fence <br />between their properties. <br /> <br />Berry commented that she liked the idea of spruce trees on the <br />hill, but indicated concerns about snow removal. Ettesvold <br />