pm_881005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page# 7 Wednesday, October 5, 1988 stokes questioned whether the cul-de-sac design was acceptable to fire personnel. Jopke responded that the fire marshall had reviewed the proposal and found it to meet minimum requirements. DeBenedet questioned who would maintain the road Keel replied that it was a private road and maintained by the property owners and not the city. on the site. it would be DeBenedet pointed out the importance of non-motorized pathways and questioned whether the city could stipulate that the applicant not oppose the development of sidewalks in the area. Keel responded that the city does not need approval of owners because it is a budgeted item vs. a assessed proj ect. Berry questioned whether the passage of this plan would preclude the development of the back half of the lots to the east. Dahlgren answered that the alternatives would be for the adjacent properties to join into this proposal, join later or for the developer to offer the right to connect to the road on a future date. Goedeke questioned the quality of the road to be provided. Johnson replied that a gravel road would not be allowed. Keel stated that a hard surface would need to be provided along with curb and gutter and that the road would have to be at least 24 ft. wide. John Adams, 880 Sandhurst Drive, questioned why the existing homes within the proposal were included in the PUD. Dahlgren commented that all homes within the boundaries of the PUD need to be included. Tony Kieger, 888 Sandhurst Drive, expressed concern that the proposal does not fit into the neighborhood. There is too little land area for four new homes. Kieger also expressed concern about the design of the roadway, the effect of the proposal on existing easements and inadequate space between the proposed houses. Kieger questioned whether the width of the easement was being reduced. Dahlgren responded that the easement should be 30 ft. whether than 20 ft. Mattke, the project engineer, stated that they are not sure whether the easement is 20 ft. wide or 30 ft. wide and pointed out that if the easement was 30 ft. wide the houses would have to be shifted to be out of the easement area. Mattke also pointed out that the proposed houses would not be slab on grade but split entry standard construction.