My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_881102
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_881102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:59 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/2/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#12 <br /> <br />Wednesday, November 2, 1988 <br /> <br />stand on their own if something happens and the project needs to <br />be separated in the future. <br /> <br />Johnson inquired if the developer would be requesting tax <br />increment financing from the City. Chris Seigle from Bradford <br />Schools Inc. responded that they are still considering requesting <br />tax increment financing assistance form the City. Johnson <br />stated that it would be important that the developer meet and <br />work out the tax increment financing issues with staff. <br /> <br />Stokes asked if a school could exist under the existing zoning. <br />Dahlgren responded that the school would be permitted under <br />special use permit in the R-3A district. <br /> <br />Stokes inquired if the site is zoned B-1, what controls the City <br />would have over future uses. Dahlgren replied that offices are <br />permitted uses in the B-1 district and that the City could set <br />conditions on approval. <br /> <br />Moeller asked if the town houses would be 3-story in height. <br />Haluptsok replied that they would be 2-1/2 story structures. <br /> <br />Moeller asked if the City allowed garden level town houses. <br />Dahlgren replied that they are allowed but subject to fire code <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Moeller asked if garages would be provided. Erickson replied <br />that garages would be added if the town houses were later sold. <br /> <br />Moeller asked if the code would allow there to be no parking for <br />the dormi tory uni ts. Dahlgren responded that under the PUD <br />ordinance, the developer could propose reduced parking and that <br />it would be up to the City to determine if it should be approved. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if there would be hipped roofs on all units. <br />Erickson replied that there would be gable roofs on the town <br />houses. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned how many students there would be per unit. <br />Haluptsok responded that there would be 8 students per unit. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if parking was adequate for the proposed <br />Erickson replied that based on Bradford's experience that <br />would sufficient parking provided on the site which <br />actually exceed City requirements. <br /> <br />use. <br />there <br />would <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if each student would have a car. Seigle <br />responded that of their commuter students, 80% drive and of their <br />resident population, only 50% have a car. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.