pm_881102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page#17 Wednesday, November 2, 1988 problem than what was being proposed here. Dahlgren stated that in his opinion the project was not deleterious and would be less massive than the previous proposal. Johnson stated that in a PUD, the city had the right to control color. Johnson stated that the existing building can't be matched but should have some indication of how the structures might be tied together. DeBenedet said that there were a number of color options available and that earth tones may not be what current desires are. Dahlgren stated that the Commission could specify what you don't want. O'Meara stated that he wants to consult his potential buyers before determining color and that it will be something the city would not have a problem with. Dahlgren stated that the Commission could attach a condition to require the developer to come back to the commission when a color choice is made. O'Meara stated that he was comfortable with that kind of condition. DeBenedet moved, Maschka seconded to recommend approval of a special use permit for a planned unit development and preliminary plat at 2551 Lexington Avenue with the following conditions: 1. That the cul-de-sac be redesigned in accordance with staff's desires. 2. That 20 foot wide driveways be provided between units 1 and 2 and units 3 and 4. 3. That a uniform finish in color be provided subj ect to Planning Commission review and approval in the future. 4 That Rose Place be constructed as a public improvement project. 5. That an additional right of way for the proposed cul-de-sac be provided. 6. That water and sewer lines be tested and proven to be adequate for the project. 7. That final engineering and landscape details be subject to staff approval.