pm_890201 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page#13 Wednesday, February 1, 1989 added that the people want to move because of the amount of money being offered to them. Tudisko stated that the amount of money being offered won't replace his existing house but that the neighborhood as a whole is going downhill and this provides the people in the neighborhood a good opportunity to get out. Tudisco pointed out that a overwhelming majority of people in the neighborhood are in favor of this project and that they shouldn't be penalized by a small minority wishing to stay. Ralph Keyes, 1631 Brooks, stated that he owns a home in the area but that he doesn't live there. Mr. Keyes supported the development and stated that it's too late to save the neighborhood, that change is inevitable. Keyes added that sales in the area have been less than what the County lists as the market value. Keyes testified that the time to protect the neighborhood was when Pavilion Place was first being proposed, not now. Keyes said that the owners in the area should have a chance to get reasonable value for their house, not 2 to 3 times the value. Lowell VanBerkom, 1614 Brooks, asked the Planning Commission to support the proposed proj ect. VanBerkom pointed out that the value in the area is degraded over the years as is evidenced by the below market value sales in the area. VanBerkom told the Commission that the developer has not been high pressure. Nisja explained various options for providing fire and emergency vehicle access only at the northeast corner. Lynn Kapaun stated that they believe that the Fire Department does not have to have access to the north. Kapaun added that the emergency vehicle access would have to be maintained in the winter time and would look like a road and could still be used by regular vehicles. Lawrence Lee, 2612 should be blocked neighborhood. Charlotte Avenue, stated off without blocking off that the access access into the Johnson closed the public hearing. Goedeke questioned whether the City could make a decision on this matter without a County decision on the additional access from B- 2. Keel replied that approval of the access by the County could be a condition of approval.