Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#14 <br /> <br />Wednesday, February 1, 1989 <br /> <br />Johnson stated her support for the project. Johnson pointed out <br />that there is an overwhelming majority of support in the <br />neighborhood and that the city needs to allow the people in the <br />area to get their investment out of the property. Johnson <br />supported closing the access to the frontage road at the <br />northeast corner of the site. <br />Moeller agreed with Johnson and pointed out that the access to <br />the northeast would be easily used by delivery trucks possibly <br />early in the morning. <br /> <br />stokes said that the writing was on the wall for those homes and <br />that he supports the rezoning even though he hates to see the <br />loss of residential homes in the community. <br /> <br />Maschka said that the community has to come to grips with where <br />development should stop. Maschka stated that from an economic <br />standpoint, he would support the removal of the homes. Maschka <br />added that he would support the closure of the access to the <br />northeast and construction of whatever fence is necessary to <br />provide proper screening on the north side of the property. <br /> <br />Berry complimented the neighborhood about their actions through <br />the years and stated that she supported the project because the <br />City has gone beyond the point of no return in that area. <br /> <br />Goedeke expressed his concern that if the property was rezoned <br />and the additional access from B-2 did not occur, that the <br />neighborhood would be left hanging. <br /> <br />Dahlgren informed the Commission that because the access question <br />was such a critical issue, that the Planning Commission could go <br />ahead and take action with the condition that the access be <br />provided and then the city Council could withhold final action <br />until a decision was made by the County. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated he was comfortable with the suggested and <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Dahlgren discussed an alternative design for the intersection of <br />Oakcrest and the frontage road which could provide an interim <br />solution to the issue of access to the site from the northeast. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that she couldn't support the alternative <br />suggested by Dahlgren because it would not stop people from using <br />that access. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of the <br />comprehensive plan change from low density residential to <br />business. The Commission further recommended that the Council <br />