My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_890503
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_890503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/3/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget14 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 3, 1989 <br /> <br />Koski stated that the parking stalls would not be down sized but <br />that a different angle would be used. <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that there would be a 22 foot driving <br />aisle. <br /> <br />Koski responded that there would be a total bay width of 56 feet <br />at 75 degrees which would leave about a 22 foot driving aisle <br />which is adequate. <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that it would seem more narrow because <br />there would be another 20 degrees of angle to turn through to get <br />in and out of the parking stalls. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that she felt it would be <br />conditions concerning the parking ramp <br />approval, and County approval. <br /> <br />important <br />security, <br /> <br />to add <br />RTBjMTC <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned Council liaison Kehr if the Council would <br />accept a condition requiring that the applicant come back to the <br />Planning Commission and Council to review exterior building <br />materials. Kehr responded that he believed the Council would <br />accept such a condition. <br /> <br />Maschka pointed out that the exterior materials on the south side <br />of the ramp is what is critical. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if the Commission will see the final design of the <br />Dayton's building. <br /> <br />Dahlgren responded that the City would have to specify that in <br />the approval. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Goedeke seconded to recommend approval of a <br />special use permit for site plan approval for the expansion of <br />the Rosedale Shopping Center at 1595 Highway 36 with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That final engineering, utility plans and specifications be <br />submitted for City staff approval. <br /> <br />2. That final plans for grading, landscaping, and sediment <br />control be submitted for City staff approval. <br /> <br />3. That detailed plans of building materials and signage be <br />submitted for City staff approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.