pm_890503 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION pagei16 Wednesday, May 3, 1989 DeBenedet asked if agreement could be reached in a 12 month period. Bestrom responded that yes it has to be done because the Dayton's construction requires the removal of the existing bus drop off area. Johnson pointed out that this is the only time the City can deal with the issue, that transit facilities need to be there and agreement is important. Bestrom pointed out that the RTB has the power of condemnation and that this could be the fall back position. Bestrom added that there appeared to be two separate issues. Johnson stated that the City needs transit to be there. Dahlgren pointed out to the Commission that there are a series of construction modules, the last of which is Dayton's. Dahlgren pointed out that an alternative could be to tie the issuance of the building permit to Dayton's to the mass transit solution. Johnson questioned if this would be fair to Dayton's. Dahlgren stated that a cooperatively and that time practical problem because Carson's. solution has to be arrived at is needed. Dahlgren pointed out the the best location is controlled by Johnson asked when the construction of the Dayton's store would occur. Bestrom responded that Dayton's construction would in the Spring of 1990. The Dayton's architects stated that a 12 month period could be a problem because the construction would be started the first of January and that at 12 months, they would be out of the ground. Johnson stated that 6 months would appear to be better. Nisj a pointed out that the solution could also be tied to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Roll Call: Ayes: Berry, Goedeke, Maschka, DeBenedet, Stokes, Johnson Nays: None