Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 4 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 3, 1989 <br /> <br />Howe responded that there should be no problem. <br /> <br />Keel stated that no lift station would be required. <br /> <br />DeBenedet inquired about the process on water line looping. <br /> <br />Keel responded that the City would acquire all easements and the <br />developer would pay for the construction of the main. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated concern about taxpayers having to pay for the <br />water line and that the developer should pick up the total costs. <br />DeBenedet added that he was reluctant to vote for the proposal <br />until the issue is worked out. DeBenedet asked if the water line <br />looping had been discussed with the property owners who would <br />have to grant the City easements for the line. <br /> <br />Keel responded that no discussions had occurred yet. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that he had a problem with the 90 degree curve <br />in the road and pointed out that a 150 foot radius is required by <br />the subdivision ordinances. DeBenedet asked if a variance would <br />be necessary because of this. <br /> <br />Keel responded that he had not specifically looked at that issue. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that a variance would not be necessary and that <br />he did not have a big concern with the 90 degree bend. <br /> <br />DeBenedet added that he has observed conflicts in similar <br />situations with cars moving too fast and there being conflicts <br />with pedestrians trying to walk in the area. <br /> <br />Charles Self, 1966 Ryan, stated that he was concerned about the <br />proposed water loop because it would probably go through his <br />property. Self asked what his obligations and rights are and <br />could he refuse to grant an easement. Keel responded that the <br />process would be for the City and Mr. Self to negotiate a price <br />for the easement. Keel continued, that if the City couldn't <br />reach an agreement with the property owner, it could either <br />abandon the idea or choose to condemn the easement if it were <br />absolutely essential. Keel pointed out that the neighborhood <br />would receive a benefit from looping the water line. <br /> <br />Self questioned whether the City would own the easement area. <br /> <br />Keel answered that the property owner still owns the property <br />under the easement but the City has the right to put the water <br />line in and to maintain it. <br />