Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page'15 <br /> <br />Wednesday, September 6, 1989 <br /> <br />to require everything to be brick because this is still an <br />industrial area. <br /> <br />Berry pointed out that this is a problem because the City has <br />delayed in passing specific design standards. <br /> <br />Berry moved, wietecki seconded to recommend approval of the <br />variance to sideyard setback at 2737 Fairview Avenue with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the precast be of matching color to the brick and have <br />a raked finish. <br /> <br />2. That a landscape plan be submitted for staff review and <br />approval which would have trees and landscaping on the south <br />side of the property. <br /> <br />Goedeke pointed out that smooth concrete would be ugly. McGough <br />stated that the precast could have texture and originally thought <br />about a raked finish. <br /> <br />Maschka stated that the City has to come up with a policy <br />concerning redevelopment of buildings and they can't be treated <br />the same as new buildings. Maschka said that the City has to be <br />able to be flexible to deal with individual situations. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br />wietecki, Goedeke, Maschka, Berry <br />DeBenedet <br /> <br />Abstain: Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />other Business <br /> <br />Design Standards. <br /> <br />Johnson summarized the history of the design standards and that <br />the intent was to get input tonight and for staff to come back <br />with specifics at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Dahlgren discussed the design standards including existing <br />standards in the B-6 district. Dahlgren questioned if it would <br />be appropriate to control exterior materials. <br /> <br />Maschka stated that he had no disagreement for controls on new <br />buildings but that there has to be flexibility to deal with <br />remodeling different from new buildings. Maschka stated that the <br />life of the building may not justify the expense of bringing it <br />into compliance. <br />