pm_890906 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Pagel 7 Wednesday, September 6, 1989 Berry said that the Commission might want to tour sites where compromises have been made such as Tower Glenn and Villa Park because, in her opinion, those are now problems. Goedeke stated he would like to know what the agreement with staff was and that he was uncomfortable with requiring sidewalk on Fernwood. Dahlgren stated that there was no agreement but staff thought it was a good proposal if sidewalk were provided on Larpenteur Avenue. Berry stated that 50% improvement automatically requires sidewalk if not the City could back down on the sidewalk as a trade off for stuccoing. Berry stated that the City needs standards for development and that if we yield, then those standards have no meaning. Dahlgren pointed out that many of the developers costs are due to conditions imposed by the City, not by the building improvement. Dahlgren stated that he is not sure the proposal would exceed 50% and that the sidewalk on Fernwood was not an important issue with staff. Maschka stated that the applicant was blind sided on the sidewalk issue and that he was troubled by it. Johnson stated that staff doesn't make agreements, only provide information and suggestions. Goedeke asked if the sidewalk is in the motion. responded that it was. Johnson Roll Call: Ayes: DeBenedet, Stokes, Berry, Johnson Nayes: Wietecki, Goedeke, Maschka Amdahl stated that the sidewalk requirement was a blind side and that the only pedestrian issue was access to Dunlap which is being provided. Johnson thanked the applicant for the improvements that they had made from the previous plan. Planninq File 2002 victor Vik/Gerald Mundt request for a lot division and setback variances at 476 Woodruff Avenue.