pm_891101 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Pagef15 Wednesday, November 1, 1989 3. That a Fire Department key and lock box be provided subject to review and approval by the Fire Chief. 4. That monies for sidewalk be escrowed on the north side of the property. other Business Review of Dayton's plans. Presentation Dahlgren summarized the history of the proj ect and stated that this matter is being brought back to the Planning Commission because it was a condi tion of the approval of the Rosedale expansion. Ian smith reviewed the building design. Stokes questioned how they could be permitted to construct this design because it was not constructed of brick. Johnson replied that the requirement is for equal quality not for brick. smith replied that it is a stone like material but not brick. Johnson pointed out that the material should be compatible with the existing center. Dahlgren stated that at the time of the original approval, the Dayton's design was not known and that the city required the detailed plans to be reviewed by the Planning commission and City Council. Dahlgren pointed out that each store and tenant building are different materials. Dahlgren added that the anchor tenants each own their site and each development has been processed separately. Dahlgren pointed out that there is no law which requires brick but that every development in an sc zoning district is subject to site plan approval. The applicants are free to propose materials and design and exteriors and the Planning commission and Council could approve or disapprove them. DeBenedet stated that he would like to see the actual material and thought that the Planning commission and city Council required review of the exterior which would give the City some control. Dahlgren clarified the requirement and stated that the design is subject to City review and approval. Johnson questioned how the material is applied to the building.