My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_891206
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_891206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:09 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/6/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, December 6, 1989 <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2027 <br /> <br />Liberty Rosewood Limited Partnership request for a sign variance <br />at 2750 victoria street. <br /> <br />Jopke explained that the applicant has requested that this matter <br />be continued to the January meeting. <br /> <br />Goedeke, stokes seconded to continue the hearing on this matter <br />until January 3, 1990. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Wietecki, DeBenedet, Berry, Goedeke, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2037 <br /> <br />Michael Peterson request for a lot division at 899 W. County Road <br />B. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location, history of development <br />proposals on the site and the proposed lot division. <br /> <br />Keel summarized the Engineering concerns including the retaining <br />wall height and the possibility that a lift station might be <br />required. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned how the setback requirements for front yards <br />would be applied in this case. Dahlgren replied that the <br />dwelling would clearly be 30 feet away from the street but that <br />an interpretation could be made that it should be 30 feet from <br />the property line of the lot where the existing house is. <br /> <br />Johnson commented that it is an extremely difficult lot to <br />develop. <br /> <br />wietecki testified that the proposal is schematic at this stage <br />because it is a lot division and that it would be premature to <br />review the setback of the building. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that it was important for the Commission to <br />identify potential issues which could effect the development of <br />the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.