pm_891206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page# 3 Wednesday, December 6, 1989 Dahlgren pointed out that these were tentative plans at this point. Michael Peterson stated that the development would be close to the way that it is shown on the plans because of the lay of the land. Peterson pointed out that if the house is located further back than they would have difficulty getting gravity flow sewer service to work on the first floor of the house. Goedeke questioned whether the driveway would be over the existing storm sewer. Keel replied that the driveway would not be on the storm sewer. Goedeke questioned how the power lines on the site would affect development. Peterson replied that he has talked to NSP and they could move the power lines to go around the proposed building. Goedeke pointed out he had tried to discuss the matter with adj acent neighbors and the ones that he talked to seem to not obj ect to the proposal. Goedeke pointed out that there are, however, some large lots in the area. Dahlgren stated that the lot would lack depth but not width so there would be no aesthetic problem with the proposal. Berry pointed out that a turn around would be needed on the site because the site abuts on the county road. Dahlgren stated that a turn around was discussed and is shown on the plan. Berry asked if the applicant understood the dedication requirement. Peterson questioned if the dedication would require the home to be moved back. Berry replied that it would not. Peterson stated that the dedication shouldn't be a problem. Berry pointed out that this appeared to be a nice solution to the site. Johnson closed the public hearing. Berry moved and DeBenedet seconded to recommend approval of the lot division with the following conditions: 1. That 10 feet of right-of-way be dedicated along County Road B. 2. That a driveway turnaround be provided on the site.