My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_891206
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_891206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:09 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/6/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 4 <br /> <br />Wednesday, December 6, 1989 <br /> <br />3. That city staff approve the driveway design and any required <br />retaining walls. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether there <br />issues because the site abuts on <br />that any issues would be taken <br />issuance of a building permit. <br /> <br />would be any <br />a County Road. <br />care of at the <br /> <br />Ramsey County <br />Keel answered <br />time of the <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Wietecki, DeBenedet, Berry, Goedeke, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2042 <br /> <br />Centennial united Methodist Church request for variance at 1524 <br />W. County Road C2. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location of the site, the history of <br />development on the site, and the variance request. <br /> <br />Keel stated that the existing drainage works well on the site and <br />that there would be no need for additional storm sewer work on <br />the site. <br /> <br />Clifford Lund stated that there was curbing provided around the <br />church itself but requested a variance to the requirement that <br />curbing be added around the perimeter at this time. Lund pointed <br />out that if they had known about the requirement, they would have <br />handled the project differently. Lund stated that they would <br />like to not have to provide the curbing or to have a five to six <br />year time frame to provide it so that they could set up a budget <br />to raise the money needed to provide the curbing. <br /> <br />Jopke read the City's action at the King of Kings Church allowing <br />them to not provide perimeter curbing for a five year period or <br />until a major improvement is handled. <br /> <br />Berry stated that she was troubled by the fact that contractors <br />keep doing work without permits. Berry stated that some type of <br />contractor notification should be required. Johnson stated that <br />the Commission could talk to Craig Waldron later about potential <br />solutions. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded to recommend Council approval of <br />the variances allowing a deferral of curbing requirements until <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.