My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900103
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:09 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:54:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/3/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page' 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, January 3, 1990 <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that the private storm sewer appears to be <br />located on the property line. He said it was originally supposed <br />to be in from the property line. DeBenedet questioned if the <br />County was aware of this. Keel stated that it is the County's <br />responsibility to inspect this. DeBenedet stated that the County <br />should be informed of this storm sewer location and that the <br />County should possibly have more future interaction with the City <br />and developers. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that he is quite comfortable with the <br />development and likes the sign and the developer's agreement to <br />reduce the light wattage. <br /> <br />Goedeke added that he was concerned with the light being located <br />on the right-of-way and is now glad they are going to move the <br />lights and reduce wattage. Goedeke said he feels they should <br />notify the County of the storm sewer located on the property <br />line. <br /> <br />DeB7nedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of the <br />var1ance for the 2-1/2 foot setback of the sign with the <br />condition that the 300 watt light be put on the property and that <br />the County be notified about the storm sewer location on the <br />property line and any County concerns be addressed. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the architect did a good job with the <br />development's appearance. <br /> <br />Berry commented that the neighborhood is pleased with the <br />project. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Goedeke, wietecki, Berry, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 1990 <br /> <br />Ashland Oil request for rear yard setback, parking setback and a <br />number of parking stall variances at 1925 Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Jopke updated the Commission on the status of this request. <br />Berry moved and DeBenedet seconded to continue this item to the <br />February Planning Commission meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.