My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900307
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/7/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 8 <br /> <br />Wednesday, March 7, 1990 <br /> <br />Rosene stated that they could reconfigure their plan to not <br />overlap on City property. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of a <br />special use permit as per the plans presented to the Planning <br />Commission dated 3/90 with the following conditions: <br /> <br /> a) <br /> b) <br /> c) <br /> d) <br /> e) <br /> f) <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />be review and approval of final drainage, <br />utility abandonment, grading, and other <br />details by City staff; <br />be City staff approval of final landscape <br />that 3 percent of the parking area be <br /> <br />That there <br />utilities, <br />engineering <br />Tha t there <br />plans and <br />landscaped; <br />That there be construction of a sidewalk or escrow of <br />funds for sidewalk along Fulham street, except the <br />northerly two lots; <br />That there be an agreement regarding use of City land <br />on the west end of the site (contiguous to Fulham <br />Pond). There should be no improvements on City land. <br />That there be final review of exterior lighting plans <br />by city staff; and <br />That there be an erosion control plan filed with the <br />city. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Stokes, Goedeke, Berry, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2046 <br /> <br />Roseville Properties request for variance to pylon sign area at <br />1955 County Road B2. continued from 2/7/90 Planning commission <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Jopke stated that he received information from the applicant <br />today and there was not enough time to review the information <br />prior to the meeting. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to continue this matter until <br />April 4, 1990. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.