pm_900404 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page1/: 2 Wednesday, April 4, 1990 Dahlgren summarized the site location, history of the property, and the requested variance to parking setback and curb requirements. Keel stated that the minimum parking setback requirement for the City of Roseville is 15 feet and this property does not meet the requirement. Keel added that the maximum driveway width requirement for the City of Roseville is 26 feet and these driveways exceed the maximum width. Keel summarized the drainage patterns of the parking lot. Wietecki questioned the width of the driveways. Keel stated that the driveways vary in width from approximately 34 to 48 feet. Berry questioned what the city's policy is concerning parking lots. wietecki questioned if the southeast corner of the property has a paved right-of-way. Keel replied that the right-of-way is paved on this portion of the property. Goedeke questioned if the residents across the street from the property have had problems with drainage. Keel replied that the Ci ty has received no complaints from the residents across the street from the property about drainage problems. James Greenstein, a trustee from st. Rose of Lima was present to represent st. Rose. Greenstein reviewed the history of the site including the construction of buildings and the parking lot. Greenstein commented that the church cannot afford to make any parking lot alterations at the present time and are facing a possible year end deficit. He added that this is the reason for their variance request. Goedeke questioned if the variance is not granted, will the handicapped parking suffer. Goedeke added that he does not like the present appearance of those spaces. Greenstein replied that they would lose a portion of their handicapped spaces and there is already a shortage of parking. Johnson closed the public hearing. Johnson suggested that the Commission require that this site come into compliance within 5 years.