pm_900404 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page:# 3 Wednesday, April 4, 1990 Keel explained what dedications are needed for the property to come into compliance. Keel added that the city of Roseville can ask for the dedications but can't require the applicant to dedicate property. Wietecki commented that a variance for the dedication would be appropriate. Goedeke commented that a variance for the dedication would not be appropriate because the parking area abuts the street. MOTION Berry moved and Goedeke seconded to approve the variance to parking setback and curb requirements with the recommendation that st. Rose of Lima work out the details with staff to bring their parking lot up to code within the next five years. Roll Call: Ayes: Berry, Goedeke, Wietecki, Johnson stokes, Roberts, Nayes: Planning File 2046 None Roseville Properties request for variance to pylon sign area at 1955 County Road B2. Presentation Dahlgren summarized the site location, the proposed sign size, and the setback. Dahlgren commented that a shopping center of this size may have up to 3 pylon signs, each sign being 35 feet high and a total of 200 square feet. Dahlgren added that the proposed sign will be 14 feet by 14 feet (196 sq. feet) and will be raised to a height of 35 feet. Daniel Commers was present to represent Roseville Properties. Commers presented to the Planning Commission examples of the proposed sign. Berry questioned the color and texture of the proposed sign and what type of materials will be used. Commers stated that the colors used will be similar to those used on the building. Johnson questioned if the sign will have internal lighting. Commers replied that the sign will have internal lighting.