My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900404
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:15 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/4/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 9 <br /> <br />Wednesday, April 4, 1990 <br /> <br />Scott stated that if the license is <br />limitations on the number of games, <br />limits to the users on the facility, <br />limited. Scott pointed out that the <br />of the attraction at other arcades. <br /> <br />approved, there should be <br />that there should be age <br />and that smoking should be <br />crowded atmosphere is part <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Roberts stated that it was <br />commission should not make a <br />minutes speak for themselves. <br /> <br />his feeling that the <br />recommendation but to <br /> <br />Planning <br />let the <br /> <br />Berry testified that she believed that the Palisades Apartments <br />and Villa Park units were beyond the 350 foot notice requirement. <br />Berry also stated that the City should not place limits on some <br />businesses which have not been placed on similar businesses in <br />the past. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that this was a license issue, not a land use <br />issue and that she was not prepared to comment on any license <br />issues. <br /> <br />stokes stated that he agreed with Commissioner Roberts that it <br />would not be appropriate for the Planning Commission to make a <br />recommendation on this matter but to merely transmit the comments <br />received to the Council as they have directed. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commission that no formal <br />recommendation be forwarded. <br /> <br />Planning File 2062 <br /> <br />Richard Kotoski request for the division of a platted lot at 858 <br />W. County Road B. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the site location and history of the proposed <br />lot division and reviewed the dedications of right-of-way. <br /> <br />Keel stated that the utility services are in place and the <br />assessment for the utilities would be $1,540.25 <br /> <br />Goedeke commented that the present property has been upgraded and <br />looks very nice. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.